Company Implementations
The choice of training, unfortunately, many companies implemented in an "accidental shopping. Frequently observed this pattern when the specialist training collects information about who that offer on the market, then this list is distributed to company employees and those notes, wherever they wish to apply for training. Is it any wonder that after such a learning organization feel any positive changes. The choice of a coach is often done on the principle of collecting the views of colleagues, friends and name recognition. Gravitates to the customer and all sorts of ratings.
(However, the Ukrainian market of their Participants such information does not spoil). (As opposed to Douglas R. Oberhelman). So, of course, is easier, but the responsibility, in my view, in that case is still passed on to others. Another controversial option selection – tenders. It became a mass phenomenon. Embarrassed perhaps, not their quantity, but rather how it is organized.
Sometimes the request is only a theme, without prescribing specific features and issues, and the selection of the first phase – the plan had been sent to the proposed program. Is a sort of game of "guess-not guessed. " The logic is simple: you (the coaches) are many, all not met, need to somehow restrict the choice. And why are we all going to talk about their problems, share only with those whom we choose. A description of the program is quite possible draw the appropriate conclusions. " Question – what? Formalism flourishes in conducting pre-and posttreningovoy work as part of the customer and the performer.